They Said She Was Crazy. He Said, “Tell Me More.” Jimmy Dore Hosts Candace Owens in a Showdown Over Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

The killing of Charlie Kirk has prompted a high-stakes investigation not just into the perpetrator, but into the official story itself. Jimmy Dore recently dedicated a segment of his show to a detailed discussion with Candace Owens, who used the platform to present her evidence and challenge the accepted narrative of the assassination.

They Said She Was Crazy. He Said, "Tell Me More." Jimmy Dore Hosts Candace Owens in a Showdown Over Charlie Kirk's Assassination | Philly PI

The conversation focused on exposing what Owens and Dore categorize as critical inconsistencies and alleged suppression of facts by powerful entities, including influential Zionist donors, conservative media figures, and leadership within Turning Point USA. Owens stated that these groups are working to control Kirk’s posthumous “legacy” and discredit her for raising legitimate questions.

The Core Disputed Claims

The interview systematically addressed multiple points of contention surrounding the event and its aftermath:

  • Security Failures: Questioning the comprehensive lack of security measures at the TPUSA event that allowed a sniper to successfully target Kirk.
  • Missing Video Evidence: The segment focused on disputes over unavailable drone footage and other removed video evidence from the scene.
  • Ballistics and Medical Reports: They discussed detailed medical evidence that they argue is inconsistent with the effects of a .30-06 rifle shot, the reported weapon.
  • Insider Warnings: The discussion included references to alleged text messages in which Kirk reportedly warned, “they are going to kill me.”

Connecting the Dots

Dore and Owens linked the handling of the Kirk case to what they describe as a broader pattern of establishment narrative control involving media, intelligence agencies, and political elites. They drew parallels to the official accounts of the JFK assassination, COVID-19 origins, and the George Floyd incident, urging audiences to maintain skepticism toward unified institutional narratives.


What do you think? Post a comment.


This highly engaged discussion provides a comprehensive look at the arguments challenging the established facts surrounding the tragic death of Charlie Kirk.


Watch the full discussion here:

- Advertisement -

EXPLORE MORE

China backs Cuba after Trump says island ‘will fall’

Beijing has vowed to support Havana against external interference after the US…

The ‘Russian Bounties’ Hoax: The Fake News Story That Promoted Michael Schwirtz to the Top

In June 2020, The New York Times delivered what appeared to be…

Why did the variable-sweep wing survive on large aircraft?

Tu-22M and Tu-160 – from the experimental Project 145 to the Tu-160MVariable-sweep…

THEIR DRAMA THRIVES ON ATTENTION (YouTube – Paul Bryson)…

THEIR DRAMA THRIVES ON ATTENTION❗️ (YouTube - Paul Bryson)  A photo posted…

Critical Debate Exposes Major Shapiro and Garrity Clashes Over Trump Policies

PHILADELPHIA — Pennsylvania political leaders recently took center stage as high-stakes policy…

Share This Article

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Meuser Chairs FSC Oversight & Investigations Committee Hearing in Little Rock

As congressional oversight intensifies across the nation, U.S. Representative…

Massive Star Wars Secret Uncovered: This Was Actually The Plan All Along

The sprawling narrative of a galaxy far, far away…

Turkey Recruits Trump Insiders For New Washington Lobbying Push

Via Middle East Eye The Turkish government hired a lobbying firm…

Who is Newsweek’s Josh Hammer?

The Shaping of a Jewish Media Figure Josh Hammer…

Russia Issues Final Warning to West as Dobropillia Becomes a Critical New Cauldron

The geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe stands at a…