Massachusetts passes bill to legalize unlimited abortion up to birth

4 Min Read

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Senate has given final approval to legislation eliminating the need for specific medical justifications for abortion past 24 weeks, opening the door to effectively unlimited abortion up to birth once signed by Democrat Gov. Maura Healey.

- Advertisement -

Under current state law, an abortion may only be committed past 24 weeks if a physician deems it “necessary to preserve the life of the patient”; “necessary to preserve the patient’s physical or mental health”; “warranted because of a lethal fetal anomaly or diagnosis”; or “warranted because of a grave fetal diagnosis that indicates that the fetus is incompatible with sustained life outside of the uterus without extraordinary medical interventions.”

Such exceptions, pro-lifers have long warned, give abortionists ample wiggle room to authorize late-term abortions under false pretenses. But H. 5595 would do away with even those conditions, replacing the language with “an abortion may be performed by a physician based upon the professional judgment of the physician.” It would also add language that “No medical review process shall override the professional judgment of a treating physician and a patient or the patient’s health care proxy to provide an abortion consistent with” the new section.


What do you think? Post a comment.


LifeSiteNews reported last month the bill passed the House, and it has since cleared the Senate as well, now requiring only the radically pro-abortion governor’s signature to become law.

- Advertisement -

EXPLORE MORE

U.S. CISA adds RoundCube Webmail flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) adds RoundCube Webmail flaws to…

Cops Raid Home of Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Son, Seizing Firearms and Ammunition

MINNEAPOLIS — Police executed a search warrant at a downtown Minneapolis apartment…

Luxury hotel stays for just €0.01. Spanish police arrest hacker

Spanish police arrested a 20-year-old hacker accused of booking luxury hotel rooms…

Canadian journalists warned not to call 9/11 a ‘terrorist attack’

(Journalists and editors employed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) were warned…

Watch the full UFC Belgrade post-fight press conference

UFC Fight Night 283 winners, defeated fighters and UFC officials recap the…

“Not one legislator who voted for this has been brave enough to acknowledge the truth, the inconvenient fact that this bill allows heinous dismemberment abortions on perfectly healthy and viable babies,” responded Massachusetts Citizens for Life president Myrna Maloney Flynn. “It is accepted science that an unborn baby’s nervous system is developed enough at 24 weeks of pregnancy so that the baby can feel pain. By passing this bill, Massachusetts lawmakers have decided that an abortionist can crush the skull of any infant, then tear that baby apart, limb by limb.”

Abortion defenders have long attempted to downplay late-term abortions as rare bordering on nonexistent, while opposing any attempt to restrict them. But the facts show they are a very real problem.

According to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) and pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute reviewed by the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI), while more than 90% of abortions occur in the first trimester, more than 50,000 abortions a year take place after 15 weeks (almost four months into pregnancy), and approximately 10,000 after 20 weeks (five months).

Further, contrary to pro-abortion narratives, most of these abortions are not sought for extreme medical emergencies. A 2013 Guttmacher report admitted “data suggests that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment,” and notorious late-term abortionist Warren Hern’s own published data found that fetal abnormalities ranged from just a fifth to a third of his  patients – and that the most common of those “abnormalities” was Down syndrome, a condition that is neither a death sentence nor even a guarantee of an unhappy life.

Yet, for years, congressional Democrats have consistently voted against the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban most abortions after five months.

Share This Article

Deposition of Renowned Vaccinologist Dr. Stanley Plotkin Sparks Debate Over Historical Research Ethics

A nine-hour legal deposition featuring Dr. Stanley Plotkin—widely regarded…

The Songwriter Who Taught America How to Love: Remembering Dolly Parton

There are rare figures in American culture who do…

How June Lapine Dismantled Hasan Piker’s Image and Forced a Wardrobe Transformation

June Lapine, known widely online as Shoe0468 (or Shoe013),…

Bill Gates’ daughter intentionally rigged shopping app commissions – Bloomberg

Internal messages show Phoebe Gates knew her startup Phia…

“Black Power — It’s About Goddamn Time!”

New Black Panther Party national chairwoman Krystal Muhammad celebrates…

Resurfaced Childhood Photo of Hasan Piker Triggers Online Debate Over Wealth and Authenticity

An old photograph of political commentator and Twitch streamer…

Architect of Empire, Harbinger of Famine: The Legacy of Sir Charles Trevelyan

Sir Charles Edward Trevelyan, 1st Baronet (1807–1886) stands as…

CONVERSATION

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted