The Lindsay Clancy murder trial stumbled toward a mistrial declaration today as defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked for an opportunity to file an appeal allowing him to argue that the jury should not be dismissed and the holdout juror be replaced so that the proceedings can continue without a dismissal.
Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan for a day to make his appeal. Sullivan gave him just 60 minutes.
Court observers expressed shock at Reddington’s move, calling it a desperate “Hail Mary pass” attempt. Legal expert Jonathan Turley said, “This is perfectly bonkers.”
“If I was the judge, I would say, ‘Let me get this straight: you objected to my not swapping out the alternate and you’re waiting now to go and file something like this? You’re just a bit late on that, pal, and I’m going to go ahead and declare a mistrial!’”
EXPLORE MORE
First Secondary Sanctions Applied: US Blocks Egyptian Bank From Accessing Dollars Over 'Iran Ties'
The US Treasury Department on Friday unveiled its first 'secondary' Iran sanctions…
DKnife toolkit abuses routers to spy and deliver malware since 2019
DKnife is a Linux toolkit used since 2019 to hijack router traffic…
Xbox Is Paying A Lot Less Than Normal For Kojima’s Physint, Possibly Under $200 Million – Report
New Xbox CEO Asha Sharma has made a lot of big moves…
Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates for February 2026 fix six actively exploited zero-days
Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates for February 2026 fix six actively exploited…
PATRIOT MISSILE SHORTAGE: FOUR-YEAR DELAY LOOMS FOR DEFENSE GIANT ORDERS
WASHINGTON — Pentagon planners and foreign military attachés face a sobering industrial…
SAUDI DEFENSE PAPER TIGER: FOREIGN CONTRACTORS AND INTEL LEAKS IN YEMEN
RIYADH — As geopolitical volatility escalates across the Arabian Peninsula, Saudi Arabia’s…
“This case is dead as Dillinger,” declared Turley, commenting during Fox News’ live coverage of the trial.
Famed defense attorney Allan Dershowitz offered a different interpretation of Reddington’s actions. Dershowitz said that Reddington was playing the long game, laying a foundation for precluding a retrial on the basis of protecting his client from double jeopardy.
When the court reconvened after the hour was up, Judge Sullivan announced that the appellate court judge had denied the relief sought by Reddington. As anticipated, Sullivan announced the jury was deadlocked and declared a mistrial.
The mistrial declaration stems from one male juror’s refusal to accept that there was reasonable doubt of Lindsay Clancy’s guilt regarding the murder of her three young children.
Conservatives on social media began hailing the male juror as a hero even before the judge’s final declaration of a mistrial.
“A single LONE MAN held out against the many to not let her off,” Matt Van Swol said on X.
“GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!” he declared.
🚨#BREAKING: Judge declares mistrial in Lindsay Clancy murder case after hung jury.
— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) September 4, 2026
A single LONE MAN held out against the many to not let her off.
GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!
“The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy,” Nick Sortor noted.
“This man is an absolute HERO!” Sortor said.
“THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free!” Sortor added.
🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 4, 2026
This man is an absolute HERO!
THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free! pic.twitter.com/GT43k7bS6N
“One heroic male juror held the line for six days. This should have been a guilty verdict, but at least he prevented the atrocity of an acquittal,” The Daily Wire host Matt Walsh said. “Now it’s up to the DA to do the right thing and prosecute the case again.”
On Friday morning, as the trial reconvened on the seventh day of jury deliberations, Judge Sullivan heard arguments from the prosecution and the defense regarding the single holdout juror, who, according to a note sent by the jury foreperson yesterday, “refuses to listen to the law … on reasonable doubt.”
Before the day began, Reddington filed a motion asking that “there be no further sidebars and this trial and all related proceedings will be handled in open court.”
It became abundantly evident that Reddington believed the jury was split 11-1 in favor of his client. His statements to the court show that he wanted the holdout juror removed from the case.
Over defendant attorney Reddington’s objection, Judge Sullivan said he would not conduct a further inquiry of the juror causing the impasse and would send the jury back to deliberate. He stated that he would direct the jury panel to “follow the law as I give it to you, whether you agree with it or not.”
At 9:30 a.m. Sullivan called the jury into his courtroom, and after giving a few instructions, sent them back to deliberate. Two hours later, they returned and told the judge they remained deadlocked.
