NASA just admitted the Artemis III mission is a total work of fiction.
After decades of “planning” and burning through billions of taxpayer cash, the geniuses in charge finally realized their 2026 moonwalk was physically impossible.
It’s the ultimate bureaucratic faceplant.
We’ve gone from landing on the lunar surface with tin foil and slide rules in 1969 to not being able to find our way back with supercomputers and Elon’s rockets.
EXPLORE MORE
14 state attorneys general ask EPA to monitor abortion pills contaminating water supply
(LifeSiteNews) – The attorneys general of 14 states wrote to the U.S.…
Cardinal Müller says Europe’s rejection of Christianity will lead to its downfall
(LifeSiteNews) — Cardinal Gerhard Müller warned during a recent conference in Rome…
Google uncovers Coruna iOS Exploit Kit targeting iOS 13–17.2.1
Google warns of the Coruna iOS exploit kit, using 23 exploits across…
Missing Juvenile Cordae Watson from the 15th District Has Been Located
Missing Juvenile Cordae Watson from the 15th District Has Been Located |…
Apple issues emergency fixes for Coruna flaws in older iOS versions
Apple released iOS 16.7.15 and 15.8.7 updates for older iPhones and iPads…
US justifies sanctions against Cuba with ‘crude lies’ – Havana
The latest US oil restrictions will hit the “daily life of millions”…
But wait—there’s a plot twist that sounds like it was ripped straight from a Silicon Valley fever dream.
Jared Isaacman, the billionaire astronaut who basically has Musk on speed dial, supposedly whipped up a “Fix It” plan in just 48 hours to save the administration’s ego.
The new goal? Screw the slow-roll; let’s just yeet three missions into space and land twice before 2028.
Is it a sensible plan, or are we just watching a high-stakes game of “Lunar Chicken” where the prize is not losing to China?
The internet’s armchair scientists are already calling “BS” on the 2028 timeline, with most betting we won’t see a boot on the moon until 2030—if we’re lucky.
“If it doesn’t happen before 2030, it ain’t happening before China,” one skeptic noted, and honestly, they aren’t wrong.
We’re currently living in a timeline where we have more documentation on TikTok trends than we do on the actual surface of Mars.
Why did we regress so hard?
In the 60s, everything was “Space Age”—our cars looked like rockets and our scientists actually had, you know, ambition.
Now, we’re told that building a moon base is “too hard” or “too expensive,” while we spend trillions on things that definitely aren’t making us a multi-planetary species.
Critics say a moon colony is just a “cramped tin can” in a desert, but they said the same thing about crossing the Atlantic in the 1500s.
Newsflash: technology actually improves when you stop making excuses and start building things that explode (occasionally).
The Artemis delay isn’t just a scheduling conflict; it’s a vibe shift that proves we’ve lost our edge.
Are we really going to let the “Gateway to the Universe” be closed because of a few bad spreadsheets?
Maybe Isaacman’s “cowboy” approach is exactly the kick in the teeth NASA needs to stop acting like a library and start acting like an aerospace agency again.
Either way, 2028 is the new 1969, and the clock is ticking.
